$SO holders: who’s really holding Soul Labs?

What the $SO wallets show

Only 1 of the 25 tracked accounts has a complete history.

Balance growth was driven by one tracked account over 7 days, with none reducing. This shows growth in the sampled positions; transfers can contribute, so it does not establish market-wide buying.

The bubble map connects wallets holding 80.1% of supply. Changes across that group are worth comparing; links and timing do not prove common ownership or coordination.

Who is here: 1 of the 25 top wallets arrived in the last 24h.

Watch whether FhVo3m…HLuM's balance of about 80B moves to other accounts.

$SO by the numbers

• The room: 59/100, neutral (chain 65, X 58). Tone of 39 recent posts: mixed, 69% look like bots. Why this score: The room gauge reads 59 out of 100, labelled neutral. On this scale 0 means fear and 100 means greed. The on-chain half (64.8) leans toward greed because the one fully tracked top wallet added tokens. The X half (57.5) is weak evidence: 69% of the 39 posts look like bots, and the sample posts promote WhatsApp groups about a stock also called $SO. Mention counts are not available.
• sample: 39 matching posts from 27 identified authors. 39 sampled posts were created in the last 24h, 7 in the last hour. Available counters: 3 likes across 39 posts with that counter; 0 reposts across 39 posts with that counter; 3 replies across 39 posts with that counter; 487 views across 35 posts with that counter. These are sampled observations, not X-wide totals or evidence of growth. Engagement is a snapshot, not activity earned within those windows.
• Am I late: none of the 25 top wallets has a usable entry-price comparison this week. 1 first bought in the last 24h (80.0% of supply).
• 3.3K holders; 940 hold more than dust.
• The top 10 wallets hold 81.4% of the supply (pools, burn and exchanges excluded). The biggest one holds 80.0%.
• Snipers: no top wallet bought within 5 minutes of launch; 11 of the top wallets sniped or bundled 2+ earlier coins Whodl tracked and hold 81.6% here.
• 80.1% of the supply sits in 1 group grouped by direct token transfers. These observations do not establish common ownership.
• Last 24h: 1 account increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +80B (80.0%).
• Last 7 days: 1 account increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +80B (80.0%).
• Biggest move today: FhVo…HLuM added 80B (80.0% of supply).
• Earliest recent caller: DrewsCapital (1.2K followers), 7h ago; loudest: ridedao_io (2 likes). Recent posts only, not the first call ever.
• Mint authority revoked, freeze revoked.

Is $SO a scam? What the wallets show

Whodl does not label coins. It runs the checks below and shows what each one measured at Oct 26, 2026, 12:38 AM UTC, with a guide to what is normal for each.

• Holder concentration. The top 10 wallets hold 81.4% of the supply (pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out). What is normal?
• Linked wallets. 80.1% of the supply sits in 1 linked group of wallets. What is normal?
• Contract controls. Mint authority is revoked; freeze authority is revoked. What is normal?
• Ticker copies. No other coin using the $SO ticker was found on this chain at the last check. What is normal?

Not measured on this scan: dev record, liquidity.

These measurements describe who holds $SO and what its contract allows. They do not establish anyone's intent. How to check a meme coin step by step →

Biggest $SO holders

The largest wallets at the last check, with pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out. Balance changes include transfers, not only buys and sells.

See how these wallets link together on the bubble map →

$SO scan history

Every scan is saved as a snapshot, so you can see how the holders changed.

• Oct 26, 2026, 12:38 AM UTC (shown above)