$SO holders: who’s really holding Soul Labs?

What the $SO wallets show

Balances rose in every tracked account with a full history, but one account drives almost all of it.

The sampled sellers purchased more than they sold in verified swaps (23.9B versus 20.2B). Calling their gross sales an exit would miss that counterpoint; the purchases are not proven later buybacks.

The bubble map connects wallets holding 82.4% of supply; 80.2% shows same-block or same-transaction acquisition. Changes across that group are worth comparing; links and timing do not prove common ownership or coordination.

Who is here: 13 linked wallets were together on 3 earlier coins; 7 of the 25 top wallets arrived in the last 24h.

Watch the about 80B-token balance of FhVo3m…HLuM.

$SO by the numbers

• The room: 85/100, extreme greed (chain 94, X 76). Tone of 17 recent posts: bullish, 0% look like bots. Why this score: The room gauge reads 85 out of 100, labeled extreme greed (0 is fear, 100 is greed). The wallet-based half scores 93.6, mainly because every top wallet with a full history added tokens. The X half scores 75.5, based on 17 posts with no bot-like accounts. Counterpoints: mention counts are unavailable, and the sample posts discuss stock tickers and promote a chat group rather than clearly discussing this token.
• sample: 17 matching posts from 13 identified authors. 17 sampled posts were created in the last 24h, 2 in the last hour. Available counters: 2 likes across 17 posts with that counter; 0 reposts across 17 posts with that counter; 1 replies across 17 posts with that counter; 84 views across 15 posts with that counter. These are sampled observations, not X-wide totals or evidence of growth. Engagement is a snapshot, not activity earned within those windows.
• Am I late: none of the 25 top wallets has a usable entry-price comparison this week. 7 first bought in the last 24h (80.7% of supply).
• 13 of the linked wallets were linked together on 3 earlier coins Whodl checked; 1 of those are down 90%+ from their peak.
• 1.1K holders; 562 hold more than dust.
• The top 10 wallets hold 81.1% of the supply (pools, burn and exchanges excluded). The biggest one holds 80.0%.
• Snipers: no top wallet bought within 5 minutes of launch; 1 of the top wallets sniped or bundled 2+ earlier coins Whodl tracked and hold 80.0% here.
• 82.4% of the supply sits in 2 groups grouped by direct token transfers and same-block earliest acquisitions. These observations do not establish common ownership.
• 80.2% of supply sits in wallets with observed acquisition timing overlaps; this does not establish common control.
• Sold in the last 7 days: 20.2B (20.2%) by 5 wallets, 23.9B purchased.
• 2 of the 5 checked top wallets did not sell or reduce this week. They hold 80.1%.
• 1 of the 25 wallets are new (under 100 transactions) and hold 0.19%.
• Last 24h: 5 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +80.5B (80.5%).
• Last 7 days: 5 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +80.5B (80.5%).
• Biggest move today: FhVo…HLuM added 80B (80.0% of supply).
• Sellers moved into $AEs3…aiKx.
• Earliest recent caller: 5kbepm (2.5K followers), 7h ago; loudest: mcnopus (2 likes). Recent posts only, not the first call ever.
• Mint authority revoked, freeze revoked.

Biggest $SO holders

The largest wallets at the last check, with pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out. Balance changes include transfers, not only buys and sells.

See how these wallets link together on the bubble map →

$SO scan history

Every scan is saved as a snapshot, so you can see how the holders changed.

• Oct 24, 2026, 4:07 PM UTC (shown above)