$TIT holders: who’s really holding Trust in Trump?

What the $TIT wallets show

Balance growth was spread across 22 tracked accounts over 7 days, with none reducing. This shows growth in the sampled positions; transfers can contribute, so it does not establish market-wide buying.

The sampled sellers purchased more than they sold in verified swaps (593.9M versus 384M). Calling their gross sales an exit would miss that counterpoint; the purchases are not proven later buybacks.

The bubble map connects wallets holding 28.2% of supply; 28.2% shows same-block or same-transaction acquisition. Changes across that group are worth comparing; links and timing do not prove common ownership or coordination.

Who is here: 22 of the 25 top wallets arrived in the last 24h.

Watch Hjmg…pxsW: whether its next balance change continues or reverses the largest 24h move, and whether other tracked accounts follow.

$TIT by the numbers

• The room: 100/100, extreme greed (chain 100, X no X read). Why this score: The room gauge reads 100 out of 100, labeled "extreme greed" (0 means fear, 100 means greed). The score uses only on-chain data: every tracked account with complete data added tokens, and many top wallets arrived in the last day. There were no X posts, mention counts or price data. The main reason for caution is the 18 wallets with timing overlaps.
• sample: 0 matching posts from 0 identified authors. 0 sampled posts were created in the last 24h, 0 in the last hour. These are sampled observations, not X-wide totals or evidence of growth. Engagement is a snapshot, not activity earned within those windows.
• Am I late: none of the 25 top wallets has a usable entry-price comparison this week. 22 first bought in the last 24h (29.8% of supply).
• 3.1K holders; 834 hold more than dust.
• The top 10 wallets hold 19.5% of the supply (pools, burn and exchanges excluded). The biggest one holds 2.0%.
• 28.2% of the supply sits in 1 group grouped by same-transaction acquisitions and same-block earliest acquisitions. These observations do not establish common ownership.
• 28.2% of supply sits in wallets with observed acquisition timing overlaps; this does not establish common control.
• Sold in the last 7 days: 384M (38.5%) by 11 wallets, 593.9M purchased.
• 11 of the 22 checked top wallets did not sell or reduce this week. They hold 8.8%.
• 22 of the 25 wallets are new (under 100 transactions) and hold 29.8%.
• Last 24h: 22 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +297.5M (29.8%).
• Last 7 days: 22 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +297.5M (29.8%).
• Biggest move today: Hjmg…pxsW added 20.2M (2.0% of supply).
• 28 Solana coins use this ticker; this one is the biggest by liquidity.
• Mint authority revoked, freeze revoked, Token-2022.

Is $TIT a scam? What the wallets show

Whodl does not label coins. It runs the checks below and shows what each one measured at Oct 26, 2026, 1:00 AM UTC, with a guide to what is normal for each.

• Holder concentration. The top 10 wallets hold 19.5% of the supply (pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out). What is normal?
• Linked wallets. 28.2% of the supply sits in 1 linked group of wallets. What is normal?
• Contract controls. Mint authority is revoked; freeze authority is revoked. What is normal?
• Ticker copies. 28 coins on this chain use the $TIT ticker; check the full contract address before buying. What is normal?

Not measured on this scan: dev record, liquidity.

These measurements describe who holds $TIT and what its contract allows. They do not establish anyone's intent. How to check a meme coin step by step →

Biggest $TIT holders

The largest wallets at the last check, with pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out. Balance changes include transfers, not only buys and sells.

See how these wallets link together on the bubble map →

$TIT scan history

Every scan is saved as a snapshot, so you can see how the holders changed.

• Oct 26, 2026, 2:20 AM UTC
• Oct 26, 2026, 1:00 AM UTC (shown above)