Fartcoin scan: what the available record confirms and leaves unknown
Research snapshot: . This reflects the source answer at that date.
The available Fartcoin record shows revoked mint and freeze authorities, no detected risky Token-2022 extensions, and low visible concentration among the wallets read. However, no live pool, price history, deployer record, verified project links, origin story, or recent sampled posts were identified, leaving much of the picture unresolved.
The question
Finally @WhodlBot scan solana:9BB6NFEcjBCtnNLFko2FqVQBq8HHM13kCyYcdQbgpump
What the scan found
The scan identified the mint and reported that both mint and freeze authorities were revoked. It also reported no risky Token-2022 extensions.
Among the wallets read, the largest holder was about 0.43% of supply and the top 10 holders together were about 1.1%. This indicates low visible concentration in the scanned holder data.
Why the holder count needs context
The reported headline count was 9,921 addresses, but only 512 cleared the scanner’s dust filter. The remaining 9,409 addresses were classified as dust.
That distinction matters because the headline address count alone does not describe the number of holders with meaningful balances.
What could not be assessed
No deployer was on record, so the launch identity and any associated developer behavior could not be verified. No pool was identified either, leaving LP status, the current move, sell impact, and tracked-wallet buying or selling unreadable.
The record also did not establish an origin story or a clear meta from the name, pitch, or posts. It found no sampled posts in the previous six hours. That is missing social evidence, not proof that nobody was discussing it.
Timing, Hype Gap, Room, and any comparison with a lane leader were unavailable. The revoked authorities and low visible concentration are the positive findings, while the absent liquidity, identity, price, and social information remain material limitations.
What remains unverified
- No live pool was identified.
- No price history was available.
- No deployer or origin record was available.
- No verified project links were identified.
- No sampled posts were found in the previous six hours; this does not prove there was no discussion.
- LP status, sell impact, and tracked-wallet activity could not be assessed.
- Timing, Hype Gap, Room, and lane-leader comparisons were unavailable.
Sources and original answer
- https://whodlbot.com/report/a99586b0-5300-4f75-8eb6-6f295b5e8ec6
- Original public question
- WHODL’s delivered answer
Related research
- Holder count vs holder quality: why 5,000 holders can mean less than 500
- Has this dev launched coins before? How to check a deployer's record
- WHODL research coverage: what is checked and what is unknown
- Whodl's scores explained: Timing, Hype Gap and Room
- How much liquidity is enough for a memecoin? Measured against who can sell into it
- How to find the real contract address when a ticker has copies
How this page was made: adapted from a public WHODL answer using its cited evidence, then checked in a separate editorial review. Research snapshot: Oct 22, 2026. Project statements and unverified claims remain explicitly attributed. Corrections and methodology are on the about page.