Pons vs Pools.trade: the launchpads on Robinhood Chain
If you buy a memecoin on Robinhood Chain, it almost certainly came from a launchpad, and the launchpad decides a lot about how the coin can hurt you: how liquidity is held, who gets fees, and how easy a bundled launch is. Two launchers account for most of the activity in 2026. This is what is known about each, with the caveat that both are young and change their rules.
Pons
Pons was the first launchpad to gain scale on Robinhood Chain after the July 2026 mainnet and has been the largest source of new coins. Its own token, PONS, has been the largest asset on the chain by market cap through October 2026, which tells you how much of the early activity ran through it.
What that means for a coin launched on Pons:
- Creation is open to anyone, so the usual copycat and serial-deployer behaviour applies. Check the creator address on the explorer and its other deployments. See how to check a dev's record.
- Trading volume and fee generation on the chain have been concentrated in Pons coins and the bots trading them, which is where the sharpest early buyers operate. Expect snipers.
- As with any launcher, read the current terms for how liquidity is handled at launch and after; this guide does not assume a fixed rule, because launchers revise them.
Pools.trade
Pools.trade is Uniswap Labs' token launcher. It arrived on Robinhood Chain on August 5, 2026. Coins launch into Uniswap v4 pools with liquidity locked and a 0.25% pool fee, which means the pool cannot be pulled by the creator and trading fees accrue through the protocol's mechanism rather than being claimable at the creator's whim.
What that means for a coin launched there:
- The rug you are protected from is the liquidity pull. The pool stays.
- The rug you are not protected from is the creator, or a bundle of wallets funded by the creator, holding a large share and selling it into that locked pool. Locked liquidity makes the exit orderly; it does not make it smaller. See how much liquidity is enough and how price impact is calculated.
Launchers that did not last
At least one early launcher, Noxa, shut down within weeks of mainnet. Coins from a defunct launcher still trade, but their launch-time protections and any fee arrangements may no longer apply. Check where the liquidity actually sits now, not where the launch page said it would be.
Comparing them as a buyer
| Question | Pons | Pools.trade |
|---|---|---|
| Who can launch | Anyone | Anyone |
| Pool | Launcher-specific; check current terms | Uniswap v4, liquidity locked |
| Pool fee | Launcher-specific | 0.25% |
| Protects against pull | Depends on terms | Yes |
| Protects against creator selling | No | No |
| Where the sharp money is | Here, by volume | Growing |
The safety difference is real but narrower than it looks. On both, the number that matters is how much supply the creator and linked wallets hold, and what happens to the price if they sell. Whodl reads Robinhood Chain holders through the chain's explorer and reports top-10 share, linked wallets and modelled impact for either launcher's coins. See how to check holders on Robinhood Chain, and find scanned coins under coin reports.
How this guide was made: written by Jack Shard with AI assistance, based on the measurements Whodl makes. Last reviewed Oct 19, 2026. Details on the about page.