$iFruit holders: who’s really holding iFruit?

What the $iFruit wallets show

Over 7 days, all 24 big wallets with complete history ended with higher balances.

The sampled sellers purchased more than they sold in verified swaps (90.4M versus 36.3M). Calling their gross sales an exit would miss that counterpoint; the purchases are not proven later buybacks.

Who is here: 14 of the 25 top wallets arrived in the last 24h.

Watch 2YZ56B…UKeG.

$iFruit by the numbers

• 51/100 · Partly Real - Powered by LarpCheck (Check them out for more details on score if interested: https://larpcheck.app/c/kdToy2gcvm)
• The room: 78/100, greed (chain 94, X 63). Tone of 19 recent posts: bullish, 5% look like bots. Why this score: The room gauge reads 78 out of 100, which is 'greed' (0 means fear, 100 means greed). The on-chain side scored 93.9 because every tracked big wallet's balance rose over the week and more money came in than went out. The X side is cooler at 62.5: of 19 recent posts, 11 were mixed and 6 positive, and about 5% looked like bots. Mention counts and the 24h price move were not available.
• sample: 19 matching posts from 16 identified authors. 14 sampled posts were created in the last 24h, 11 in the last hour. Available counters: 28 likes across 19 posts with that counter; 3 reposts across 19 posts with that counter; 8 replies across 19 posts with that counter; 2377 views across 19 posts with that counter. These are sampled observations, not X-wide totals or evidence of growth. Engagement is a snapshot, not activity earned within those windows.
• Money flow (7d, tracked wallets): ~$4.7K in from 24 buyers, ~$921.8 out to 3 sellers, net ~$3.8K in.
• Am I late: none of the 25 top wallets has a usable entry-price comparison this week. 14 first bought in the last 24h (23.9% of supply).
• 282 holders; 276 hold more than dust.
• The top 10 wallets hold 27.3% of the supply (pools, burn and exchanges excluded). The biggest one holds 3.8%.
• No links were found among the examined wallets; this does not prove independence.
• 1 wallet sold within 20% of this week's high (81.7% of tracked selling); 3 bought at least 30% below it (~$480).
• Sold in the last 7 days: 36.3M (3.8%) by 3 wallets, 90.4M purchased.
• 21 of the 24 checked top wallets did not sell or reduce this week. They hold 39.6%.
• Last 24h: 16 accounts increased balance and 2 decreased. Net +209.9M (21.8%).
• Last 7 days: 24 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +435.7M (45.3%).
• Biggest move today: Dow5…FfTp added 26.6M (2.8% of supply).
• Earliest recent caller: BanditCrypt01 (1.3K followers), 4d ago. Recent posts only, not the first call ever.
• Mint authority revoked, freeze revoked, Token-2022.

Is $iFruit a scam? What the wallets show

Whodl does not label coins. It runs the checks below and shows what each one measured at Oct 25, 2026, 1:58 PM UTC, with a guide to what is normal for each.

• Holder concentration. The top 10 wallets hold 27.3% of the supply (pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out). What is normal?
• Linked wallets. No linked wallet group was found among the wallets examined. What is normal?
• Contract controls. Mint authority is revoked; freeze authority is revoked. What is normal?
• Ticker copies. No other coin using the $iFruit ticker was found on this chain at the last check. What is normal?

Not measured on this scan: dev record, liquidity.

These measurements describe who holds $iFruit and what its contract allows. They do not establish anyone's intent. How to check a meme coin step by step →

Biggest $iFruit holders

The largest wallets at the last check, with pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out. Balance changes include transfers, not only buys and sells.

See how these wallets link together on the bubble map →

$iFruit scan history

Every scan is saved as a snapshot, so you can see how the holders changed.

• Oct 25, 2026, 1:58 PM UTC (shown above)