$Fairies holders: who’s really holding Bluti Fruti Fairies?

What the $Fairies wallets show

Balance growth was spread across 25 tracked accounts over 7 days, with none reducing. This shows growth in the sampled positions; transfers can contribute, so it does not establish market-wide buying.

The sampled sellers purchased more than they sold in verified swaps (87.4M versus 39.5M). Calling their gross sales an exit would miss that counterpoint; the purchases are not proven later buybacks.

The bubble map connects wallets holding 4.1% of supply; 4.1% shows same-block or same-transaction acquisition. Changes across that group are worth comparing; links and timing do not prove common ownership or coordination.

Who is here: 9 of the 25 top wallets arrived in the last 24h.

Watch tedd…cPxm: whether its next balance change continues or reverses the largest 24h move, and whether other tracked accounts follow.

$Fairies by the numbers

• 56/100 · Likely Real - Powered by LarpCheck (Check them out for more details on score if interested: https://larpcheck.app/c/kohQTZxTyq)
• The room: 94/100, extreme greed (chain 94, X no X read). Why this score: The room gauge reads 94 out of 100, labelled extreme greed. On this scale, 0 means fear and 100 means greed. The score uses on-chain data only, because X data was missing. It is high because all 25 big wallets' balances rose this week, they all arrived recently, and more money came in than went out. Pulling the other way, those money flows were small: about $2.9k in versus $0.5k out.
• Money flow (7d, tracked wallets): ~$2.9K in from 25 buyers, ~$542.1 out to 3 sellers, net ~$2.3K in.
• Am I late: none of the 25 top wallets has a usable entry-price comparison this week. 9 first bought in the last 24h (16.7% of supply).
• 194 holders; 188 hold more than dust.
• The top 10 wallets hold 31.2% of the supply (pools, burn and exchanges excluded). The biggest one holds 3.8%.
• Snipers: no top wallet bought within 5 minutes of launch; 1 of the top wallets sniped or bundled 2+ earlier coins Whodl tracked and hold 3.8% here.
• 4.1% of the supply sits in 1 group grouped by same-block earliest acquisitions. These observations do not establish common ownership.
• 4.1% of supply sits in wallets with observed acquisition timing overlaps; this does not establish common control.
• Sold in the last 7 days: 39.5M (4.1%) by 3 wallets, 87.4M purchased.
• 22 of the 25 checked top wallets did not sell or reduce this week. They hold 47.0%.
• 1 of the 25 wallets are new (under 100 transactions) and hold 1.9%.
• Last 24h: 10 accounts increased balance and 1 decreased. Net +179.3M (18.7%).
• Last 7 days: 25 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +497.9M (52.0%).
• Biggest move today: tedd…cPxm added 33.9M (3.5% of supply).
• Mint authority revoked, freeze revoked, Token-2022.

Is $Fairies a scam? What the wallets show

Whodl does not label coins. It runs the checks below and shows what each one measured at Oct 25, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC, with a guide to what is normal for each.

• Holder concentration. The top 10 wallets hold 31.2% of the supply (pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out). What is normal?
• Linked wallets. 4.1% of the supply sits in 1 linked group of wallets. What is normal?
• Contract controls. Mint authority is revoked; freeze authority is revoked. What is normal?
• Ticker copies. No other coin using the $Fairies ticker was found on this chain at the last check. What is normal?

Not measured on this scan: dev record, liquidity.

These measurements describe who holds $Fairies and what its contract allows. They do not establish anyone's intent. How to check a meme coin step by step →

Biggest $Fairies holders

The largest wallets at the last check, with pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out. Balance changes include transfers, not only buys and sells.

See how these wallets link together on the bubble map →

$Fairies scan history

Every scan is saved as a snapshot, so you can see how the holders changed.

• Oct 25, 2026, 5:15 PM UTC (shown above)