$150ms holders: who’s really holding 150ms?

What the $150ms wallets show

Balances rose in all 23 big wallets that have full data.

The sampled sellers have 11.3M in verified sales and no matching purchases in the collected swaps. That supports selling in this evidence, not a claim that every holding was sold.

Who is here: 23 of the 25 top wallets arrived in the last 24h.

Watch whether F4pqMB…7MGR or G5596w…snDL keep making verified sales until their balances start falling.

$150ms by the numbers

• The room: 100/100, extreme greed (chain 100, X 100). Tone of 2 recent posts: bullish, 0% look like bots. Why this score: The mood gauge reads 100 out of 100, labeled 'extreme greed'. On this scale 0 means fear and 100 means greed. The on-chain half and the X half both scored 100: every tracked big wallet's balance rose, and both X posts were upbeat. On the other side, the X score rests on only 2 posts that read like promotional alerts. Mention counts are not available, and three wallets made verified sales.
• sample: 2 matching posts from 2 identified authors. 2 sampled posts were created in the last 24h, 2 in the last hour. Available counters: 0 likes across 2 posts with that counter; 0 reposts across 2 posts with that counter; 0 replies across 2 posts with that counter; 242 views across 2 posts with that counter. These are sampled observations, not X-wide totals or evidence of growth. Engagement is a snapshot, not activity earned within those windows.
• Am I late: none of the 25 top wallets has a usable entry-price comparison this week. 23 first bought in the last 24h (17.3% of supply).
• 520 holders; 511 hold more than dust.
• The top 10 wallets hold 8.1% of the supply (pools, burn and exchanges excluded). The biggest one holds 0.87%.
• No links were found among the examined wallets; this does not prove independence.
• Sold in the last 7 days: 11.3M (1.2%) by 3 wallets, no purchases observed.
• 20 of the 23 checked top wallets did not sell or reduce this week. They hold 14.8%.
• Last 24h: 23 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +169.3M (17.3%).
• Last 7 days: 23 accounts increased balance and 0 decreased. Net +169.3M (17.3%).
• Biggest move today: AJDG…gF4S added 8.5M (0.87% of supply).
• Earliest recent caller: popmemecoin (607 followers), 1 min ago; loudest: dex_kolwatcher (0 likes). Recent posts only, not the first call ever.
• Mint authority revoked, freeze revoked, Token-2022.

Is $150ms a scam? What the wallets show

Whodl does not label coins. It runs the checks below and shows what each one measured at Oct 25, 2026, 7:59 AM UTC, with a guide to what is normal for each.

• Holder concentration. The top 10 wallets hold 8.1% of the supply (pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out). What is normal?
• Linked wallets. No linked wallet group was found among the wallets examined. What is normal?
• Contract controls. Mint authority is revoked; freeze authority is revoked. What is normal?
• Ticker copies. No other coin using the $150ms ticker was found on this chain at the last check. What is normal?

Not measured on this scan: dev record, liquidity.

These measurements describe who holds $150ms and what its contract allows. They do not establish anyone's intent. How to check a meme coin step by step →

Biggest $150ms holders

The largest wallets at the last check, with pools, burn addresses and exchanges left out. Balance changes include transfers, not only buys and sells.

See how these wallets link together on the bubble map →

$150ms scan history

Every scan is saved as a snapshot, so you can see how the holders changed.

• Oct 25, 2026, 7:59 AM UTC (shown above)